Animal Farm/V for Vendetta Essay

In galore(postnominal) great texts concerning the politics, it brook be observed that the context in which the piece was created greatly influences the ways in which values and themes are presented and the form in which it is produced. study aim shaking concomitants have the power to transform paradigms of individuals and whole societies, and in identification number morph and influence the themes a text created in the same date period implores. Warner Brothers 2005 film V for Vendetta and George Orwells 1945 novelette wolf bring on both(prenominal) deal with excogitations present in the governmental climates of their successions and the problems associated with them the cost of apathy towards injustice, propaganda and its influence, and the crippling aspect of business concern. The deputation of the themes present in the two texts contrast and par in m any ways referable to the diversity in the contexts below which each was created and the comprehensive continu ity of the themes present.Read more Us constitution tyranny seeOrwells 1945 text was created at the end of the Russian social transformation that left the once optimistic Russian raft in tatters and under the boot of a brutal fascist regime, while the Hollywood scene was created post 9/11 in a time where people turned to their regimen for protection from terra incognita threats, provideing to sacrifice their intimacy for safety. It was situated in a future dystopia as opposed to wight Farms historical setting and warned of what could be the case of choosing to blindly follow the neo-conservative politics of films time such as Bushs and Thatchers parties. Both texts make political narratives that are influenced by the historical and personal context of their creation and contrast and compare greatly in form and values.Primarily, the theme of apathy, and the cost of silence is explored as well in the two cross-generational texts. Written after the solemn failure of social ism when applied to a practical setting, Orwell pessimistic all(prenominal) last(predicate)y recounts the outcome of the apathy that Russian citizens expressed in the face of blatant corruption in his fable, wight Farm. Orwells novel is written in the form of an fabrication, which recounts the events of the Russian revolution as though it took place on a British bring about, and uses various typesof fleshlys to symbolize the distinguishable classes of the soviet union (Molly the horse represents the bourgeoisie, Boxer, the proletariats). Animal maturate sets out to become a utopia where all animals are oppose working together under the inspiration of a Marxist boar named major (who represents the revolutionary leader Lenin), the animals drive out their human oppressors in a violent rebellion. The copper colors take power on the farm due to their superior knowledge and leadership qualities. Though as the papal bulls become misdirect by their power, it soon becomes clear t o the animals shiny enough to comprehend the concept of corruption, that things arent as they should be. They become aware of the pigs avarice they hoard food that should be shared evenly amongst all animals, they demoralize the accuracy to better suit their political motives, and they change the constitution of animal farm without humanity consent.Few animals possess the skill to comprehend that the pigs do not wish to help the public, and gum benjamin the donkey comes to be the nigh prominent advocate for apathy in the novelette. He is one of the smartest animals on the farm and is not fooled for a second by any of the pigs ruses that work so effectively on the others. He cadaver neutral to any conflict seen in animal farm when the hens coiffure a coup to stand up against their oppression and are later executed, not a word of protest is spoken, and when asked for his opinion on any debate only replies donkeys live a long time to mysteriously cynical way of saying it al l ends up the same. Benjamin is passive to any change whether it is good or swelled in the honeymoon phase of the revolution in which the pigs express plans for equality and emancipation for all, he remains sceptical. He is cynical to any positive outcome as he has believes only that the cycle of power and corruption depart repeat itself, as it has in the past.His silence in the face of the pigs corruption is broken only at the novels climax as his friend Boxer is driven off to the knackers in a truck the other animals believe to be transporting him to the vet. Fools Fools he shouts furiously, Fools Do you not see what is written on the side of that van? The animals evictt read the writing of course, but Benjamin could all along, as he could read Animal Farms constitution creation changed overnight. Benjamin saw the fatal path that the revolution was taking and in its aboriginal phases had the ability to turn it around. But the apathy he showed get all of animal farm forged and trapped in a mental attitude where resistancewas futile and the pigs could rule with an iron fist. Benjamin was cynical with his touch that Life would go on as it had always gone on that is, badly but in the same way he was a realist, as in the end of animal farm things did continue as they always had badly. It is questionable whether Animal Farms revolution, and the revolution of its allegory counterpart would have reached a different outcome in Benjamin, and those smart enough to sense the corruption had discarded their apathy and made their awareness known.V for Vendetta similarly deals with the concept of public apathy in the face of social injustice. Set in a future dystopian England, where a undemocratic government has come to power and dominates all aspects of their citizens lives, the films protagonist V addresses the masses to stir guilt feelings and inspiration in the hearts of the masses in a public service announcement. On a velvet backdrop to the sound of a nationalistic anthem, he speaks powerfully in a direct mid(prenominal) shot behind a podium to en shove the power of his speech. He outlines the myriad of problems plaguing England in an uncensored speech the likes of which many people in London hadnt comprehend since the rise of the Norsefire party, and after asking the rhetorical question of How did this happen? answers truth be toldif youre looking for the guilty, you get hold of only look into a mirror.V blames the oppressed for let themselves reach their situation with hopes for gaining align in a world of instability. V for Vendettas dystopian London fell to the control of the Norsefire tyranny by letting itself sacrifice liberty in hopes of safety from inexplicable threats. The context in which V for Vendetta was created is reflected in the film a wave of neo-conservative politics had embraced the U.S and Britain under the Bush and Thatcher governments, and it could be seen that post 9/11, xenophobia and prejudice had st arted to consume and revere monger in society. The film warns of the dark outcome that could eventuate if the populous chose to give in to their worry of the unknown and sacrifice free will for a stable yet controlling establishment.Although various(a) in contexts, Animal Farm and V for Vendetta come near the issue of apathy and silence similarly. They both criticise the concept by the portrayal of extremely negative outcomes that lead to create tyrannicdystopias, complimentary of free will and justice.Furthermore, Animal Farm and V for Vendetta both deal with the political concepts of propaganda and exploitation in similar ways although hailing from diverse time periods. Animal Farm sees the corruption of an idyllic utopia into and oppressive dictatorship, in which the animals are exploited by their pig oppressors, and influenced strongly by their win over propaganda. The novel once again aligns itself with factual events that occurred in the midst of the Russian revolutio n and symbolises them respectively. In the novel, skunk is a brilliant talker with the ability to turn minatory into white. The pigs utilize squealers telling talents to convince the rest of the animals of Napoleons benevolence, relinquish their monopolization of the farm, and turn Snowball into a public enemy that could be pinned with all of the farms failures.Squealer uses the memory and intelligence of the animals against them to exploit them by reinforcing a series of convincing lies, and instilling a powerful maxim four legs good, two legs bad, in the minds of the less intelligent animals, that could be used as a chant to drown out any logical argument. Squealers character corresponds with the Russian newspaper, Pravda which at the time held the power to turn black into white the same way as the pig. George Orwell is making a statement on the power of language to exploit and manipulate the masses in the form of propaganda, and warns us to be critical of political media in discharge of the events from his life.Similarly, V for Vendetta comments on the medias power to sway the opinions of the public, and the ways in which governments use it to influence citizens. V for Vendetta is based in a society where free speech is non-existent and censorship washes over all aspects of the media. The single minded force of the media, represented by the bold and compulsory Voice of London, allows the government to impose only one truth on the public only one perspective to any event so that it is the only one to believe. After Vs initiatory November 5th bombing and hijacking of the television station in order to instil hope for a revolution in the populous, Sutlers government begins to twist and re-fabricate the entire event to make it appear as though V were a terrorist meaning to harm the public.Using affectional and connotative language A psychotic terrorist, Attacked unarmed politeians, to spread a message of hate, to attach fear and stigma to the vigilante, whilst glorifying the police force during this heroic raid the terrorist was shot and killed to inspire loyalty and pride in citizens. The propaganda aims to turn public the public opinion from anarchy to fear and in turn compliance. V for Vendetta was composed at a time in which xenophobia allowed politicians to blame many faults on Terrorists typically associated with people of Muslim belief. The labelling of someone that the government believes to be a social deviant as a terrorist was a solution to political issues, and this can be seen reflectively in V for Vendetta. Both texts, written in entirely different contexts, deal with the issue of propaganda and manipulation, and have been strongly influenced by historical examples of government use of these political tools.Both texts in their respective contexts suggest that fear incapacitates the masses from revolting against oppression. They suggest that fear cripples the hearts and wills of those it dominates, and convinces its v ictims that nada is worth fighting for. Animal farm reflects the tyrannical reign of Joseph Stalin, Russias communist dictator that controlled his people through a network of fear tactics that among many things entailed the murder of millions of civilians he believed to be enemies of the state. In the Russian revolution, the oppressed became the oppressors Stalins government rose to power on a just and fair cause, but sullied it by becoming an oppressive dictatorship, hardly different to the one that the people primarily fought to escape from. In Animal Farm, violence and the fear of violence bends the animals of the farm into entry Napoleon orders the mass execution of those conspiring against him, and by its end the air was baleful with the smell of blood, which had been unknown there since the expulsion of Jones.It is ironic that things seem to be just as bad on animal farm as they were in the days of jones, yet Squealers propaganda still continues to prevail the omnipresent fear of the farmers return over their heads as if to say No matter how bad things get, they could never be as bad as they were, and continually states the rhetorical question surely you wouldnt take jones to come back?. The Fear of Joness return keeps the animals of the farm in submission, and once discarded the animals becomecapable of great deeds. Majors speech inspires and motivates the animals to stand up to their oppressor, by morphing their fear into fury. He does this by declaring that once Benjamin becomes too old he will be sent to the knackers. Orwell criticises fears power to cripple and paralyse and suggests that once discarded, people become capable of great feats of justice. Animal Farm expresses the representation of fear and its ability to cripple by aligning it with the contextual events of the Russian revolution.V for Vendetta addresses the concept of fear and violence in a very similar way in its representation of the totalitarian state of England under the Norse fire party. In light of recent events such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the film details an alternate timeline in which the westbound world has let governments turn their fear of the unknown against them, and let them unwittingly sacrifice their liberty for promises of stability and freedom. The Norsefire government uses threats of terrorism and disease to pore the populace into a state of fear, and convince them that they indigence the government in order to protect them from the outside world, when in fact all they compliments is absolute power. An example of the Norsefire governments use of fear to manipulate the public is when they feel their power slipping away in save of the masked revolutionary V High Chancellor Sutler says what we need right now is a clear message to the people of this rustic this message must be read in every newpaper heard on every radio and seen on every television, I want everyone to realize how close we stand to the edge of oblivion.I want every man woman and child to know how close we are to chaos. I want everyone to remember why the need us The message resounds with a series of dreamatic television reports showing the chaos of the outside world, water shortage, civil war, disease. The reports however fail to influence public opinion, as they have already been convinced by V that the government will lie also to prove their points. V for Vendettas representation of the governments use of fear tactics to attempt to persuade public opinions and elude from real issues resonates with political ploys used to convince the public of the threat of terrorism in the early 2000s by the Bush and Thatcher governments. When support from the public was needed to justify the invasion of Iraq, they used the media to fear monger and persuade the masses. The contexts of animal farm and V for Vendetta dealsimilarly with the issue of fear and its use by governments to coerce the public.