Journalism and Mass media Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Journalism and Mass media - Essay ExampleTherefore, from the institutionalise of view of the Associate Professor, Carmen uses methodological reductionism that the sites assist only those who require them urgently while in others it is non the case. Alternatively, Piskorski found that the online dating industry has worth of $2billion made of more than 14, 000 businesses that use various methods and techniques of matching up potential partners. For instance, OKCupid, an online dating site with a membership of about 3 million permits its users to surf apiece others profiles (Nobel, 2012). Furthermore, in that respect are algorithms and comprehensive quizzes that allow partners to have compatible matches. Similarly, in a study of about 500,000 members of OKCupid, Piskorski discovered that older, shorter and at times overweight people viewed more profiles compared to their younger counterparts. On that account, in that location are some(prenominal) methods, data and evidence used to support the claims made in the article. For instance, Carmen uses unoriginal methods of data collection such as reading books, kindred journals and internet sites to prove the validity of the article. Similarly, there is the interview on the Associate Professor of Harvard Business take aim on his studies and findings concerning various online dating sites (Nobel, 2012). Therefore, the addressable data to prove the claims made by Carmen include several online sites such as Match.com, eHarmony, OKCupid and Facebook among others that aim at matching up potential partners. ... For instance, Carmen uses secondary methods of data collection such as reading books, similar journals and internet sites to prove the validity of the article. Similarly, there is the interview on the Associate Professor of Harvard Business School on his studies and findings concerning various online dating sites (Nobel, 2012). Therefore, the lendable data to prove the claims made by Carmen include several o nline sites such as Match.com, eHarmony, OKCupid and Facebook among others that aim at matching up potential partners. On the other hand, the available evidence is the study of 500, 000 members of OKCupid who view the profiles of each other without any problem. Therefore, these claims hold because the members interviewed participate actively and newspaper publisher their results. There is also the presentation made by Piskorski on his findings in a HBS seminar concerning the various online dating sites (Nobel, 2012). On the same context, there is also the presence of the online dating sites that participated in the survey to determine the benefits of online dating. However, there are also biases and other missing information in the article by Carmen Nobel. For example, there is no alternative research on offline dating for comparison purposes with online dating. In other words, there is ecological delusion in terms of the available statistics to support the benefits of online dati ng for its members (Nobel, 2012). Additionally, the research by the Professor does not clear a follow up if the potential partners meet and the superseding consequences. This constitutes to individual fallacy whereby the other groups are not part of the research. Furthermore, Piskorski fails to mention the names of his variables during the findings hence